britney spears paparazzi public restroom

The magazines spent exorbitant amounts of money on photos because the public was buying the magazines with salacious covers and coverage. In the film, Stone also reveals the multimillion-dollar budget the weekly magazines allocated for exclusive celebrity shots. At least I'm alive.Īs Ramos notes in the film, it's “hard to get out of once you start making the kind of money these guys were making,” particularly when these photographers are largely working-class men of color without a college education.

Texas winter storms: I went 55 hours without power in freezing Austin. Despite their position at the bottom of the Hollywood food chain and the media’s reliance on their images,the paparazzi are made the scapegoat for everything wrong with celebrity culture, often in ways that collide with anti-immigrant and anti-Latino sentiment. The paparazzo featured in the film, Daniel Ramos, who worked as a paparazzo from 2004 to 2013, exemplifies this Latino demographic shift.Ī number of factors contributed to this shift, including an explosion in the number of celebrity weekly magazines that created the need and budget for photos former Us magazine photo director Brittain Stone discusses in the film, the low barriers of entry into the profession, the need for laborers willing to work around the clock, and the social networks of immigrant labor. From approximately 2002 to 2008, the demographics of the Los Angeles paparazzi transitioned from a labor force of predominantly white men to one of predominantly Latino men, many of whom are immigrants. The paparazzi are also the only demographic of predominantly BIPOC media producers in Hollywood. They are exposed to extreme risk on the job (they have been assaulted by security guards and celebrities, and even killed while working), and are frequently manipulated by celebrities and their handlers. Of the film’s villains, the paparazzi are unique in being among the most precarious groups in the Hollywood media system.

It is contradictory to assert Spears’ agency as a competent and successful entertainer as a reason for why she shouldn’t be placed under a conservatorship and why we need to #freebritney, while at the same time perpetuating the fiction that she lacked agency in her interactions with the paparazzi. She went on to date a paparazzo named Adnan Ghalib from 2007 to 2008. This 2006 photo reveals Spears in the car of a paparazzo named Galo Ramirez, who Spears had asked for a ride. This is someone we saw daily and she knew us.” “We essentially would create a motorcade for her to make sure she didn’t get lost. “When she didn’t know where she was going, she would tell us, and we would help her get where she needed to go,” one paparazzo told me. While the film shows a tearful moment of Spears complaining about the paparazzi in a 2006 interview with Matt Lauer, Outside of the infamous umbrella scene featured in the film, Spears had a collaborative and genuinely friendly relationship with many photographers. The celebrity-paparazzi relationship is far more nuanced than the film might lead viewers to believe, particularly in the case of Spears. The interview with the paparazzo is conducted and cut in a way to make clear that the interviewer places blame on the photographers for Spears’ mental and emotional state.

But it wasn’t like leave me alone forever.” What the scene leaves unexplained is what the dynamic between Spears and the paparazzi was actually like on a daily basis, outside of this evocative moment. He says, “There were times when she said leave me alone for the day. Spears’ cousin asks him not to and then Spears angrily emerges from the car with her umbrella, strikes his car, and says, “Go f_ yourself.” The interviewer in the film asks the paparazzo if he thinks the paparazzi affected Spears, and he argues that they didn’t. There is a jarring moment in the documentary where, after a paparazzo tells Spears “we’re concerned about you,” the next scene shows him trying to ask her questions. ' Framing Britney Spears,' the latest documentary from 'The New York Times Presents' series, has created many perceived villains in the Spears fiasco: her father, ex-boyfriends and husbands, her mother, media figures like Diane Sawyer and Matt Lauer, and, of course, the paparazzi. Watch Video: 'Framing Britney' documentary: Spears trying to be a 'normal person'

Britney spears paparazzi public restroom